|
Back to Home
Evidence – Maps
Evidence – Archaeological
Evidence - The Ships
Links
Reviews
E-mail
|
Ship Evidence
The Chinese junks of the 1400s dwarfed
the size of even the largest seafaring craft in Europe. The ships were approximately 330 feet long
and 132 feet wide. As a point of
comparison, the largest ship that Columbus voyaged with, the Santa Maria, had
a length of approximately 60 feet – nearly 5 times smaller! The probability of these monoliths making it past the southern
tip of Africa (keep in mind, that is where He’s ship crashed, forcing him to
return home) is next to nothing…but Menzies thinks they did much, much more.
Not only did those ships make it
past Africa, to South America, to the Caribbean, and the Eastern coast of
North America…but they also traversed Easter Island and the coast of
California….
Menzies’ Claim:
That an anchor found off the
coast of California is actually the anchor of a Chinese Junk from the ancient
voyages of He’s Treasure Fleet…
Reality:
“In 1973 a vessel dredging off the coast of California
brought up a sizable rock, carved into the shape of a doughnut. In 1975,
twenty or so similar stones were found by divers off the Palos Verdes
peninsula in southern California. These discoveries generated a great deal of
publicity at the time. Some suggested that the stones were identical to
anchor stones used on Chinese sailing vessels as far back as A.D. 500.
Reference was made to the Chinese legend of the land of Fusang, supposedly
visited by a Buddhist monk about 1,500 years ago.
As Frost (1982) points out, Fusang was placed on the Asian coast by ancient
Chinese mapmakers. Nevertheless, some have tried to identify Fusang as
America, carefully selecting elements of the legend that seem to reflect the
biogeography of the California coast. Even some professional archaeologists
suggested that the Palos Verdes anchor stones represented physical evidence
of the ancient Chinese exploration of the western coast of North America - direct
physical evidence like that seen in the examples provided by the expeditions
of Frobisher, Coronado, and de Soto.
The Palos Verdes stones were examined by the geology department at the
University of California, Santa Barbara, in 1980. Remember our discussion …..
concerning tracing the raw materials from which ancient artifacts were made.
If the anchor stones could be shown to have been made from rock present only
in China, the case for a Chinese presence in the New World before Columbus
would be much stronger. Unfortunately for the supporters of this hypothesis,
it was determined that the alleged Chinese anchors were made of California
rock (Frost 1982:26), most likely Monterey shale, a common local rock type.
The stones looked like Chinese anchors, however, because that is precisely
what they were. Chinese American fishermen commonly trawled the waters of
California in the nineteenth century. They sailed in their traditional craft,
the junk. Indeed, the Palos Verdes stones are almost certainly the anchors,
moorings, and net weights of these fishermen. They provide no help to those
who wish to prove that Fusang is, in reality, ancient California because the
anchors clearly were made locally by historically recognized Chinese
sailors.”
“Frauds, Myths and Mysteries Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology”,
Feder, K.L., McGraw-Hill, 2002 (4th edition), pp 113-114
Reference
Frost, F. 1982, The Palos Verdes Chinese anchor mystery, Archaeology,
Jan./Feb. 23-27
|
|